Skip to content

Leading Practice Mining Acts Review | Central Eyre Iron Project mining lease approved

Provenance of Mesozoic sediments in the southern Eromanga Basin, NSW: implications for the source of placer gold of the Tibooburra goldfields

Ava Stephens1, 2, Anthony Reid1, 2, Stephen Hore1, Phil Gilmore3 and Steve Hill1
1 Geological Survey of South Australia, Department of the Premier and Cabinet
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide
3 Geological Survey of New South Wales, Department of Planning and Environment

Download this article as a PDF (3.8 MB); cite as MESA Journal 84, pages 10–18

Introduction

Figure 1 Geological map of the Tibooburra–Milparinka area. Inset shows the location of the area in the context of the geological elements of eastern Australia. Australian crustal elements map courtesy Geoscience Australia data.
Figure 1 Geological map of the Tibooburra–Milparinka area. Inset shows the location of the area in the context of the geological elements of eastern Australia. Australian crustal elements map courtesy Geoscience Australia data.

Mesozoic sediments of the Eromanga Basin are a widespread component of the sedimentary cover that extends across Proterozoic bedrock in central Australia, including northern South Australia and northwestern New South Wales (Fig. 1). Explorers searching for bedrock-hosted mineralisation have considered these sediments an impediment, with geochemical characteristics unlikely to be related to underlying bedrock targets. However, these sediments have the potential to assist mineral exploration by hosting enlarged geochemical footprints of otherwise buried mineral systems. Potentially, such geochemical footprints may even provide direction information that can be considered in follow up exploration (Forbes et al. 2015). An important component to utilising sedimentary cover sequences in mineral exploration programs is understanding the paleogeographical context for the sedimentary systems, including the provenance of the sediments. Obtaining this information becomes even more compelling when cover sediments not only contain geochemical footprints of buried mineral systems, but host mineralisation in their own right (e.g. placer and sediment-hosted mineralisation).

Basal Mesozoic sediments in the Tibooburra area in northwestern New South Wales host placer gold mineralisation. The sediments were the focus of the Tibooburra–Milparinka (Albert Goldfields) gold rush of the 1880s; however, no source of primary mineralisation has been found in the Tibooburra Inlier. Nevertheless, in the Warratta Inlier to the south, primary gold mineralisation is present in the form of orogenic gold-style auriferous quartz vein networks (Thalhammer 1992; Greenfield and Reid 2006a). This primary bedrock gold has been eroded and reworked by fluvial processes to be later deposited and concentrated within Jurassic gravels, and into recent and contemporary drainage (e.g. Hill et al. 2008).

There have been several interpretations of the stratigraphy and provenance of the Mesozoic sediments surrounding Tibooburra (Kenny 1934; Morton 1982; Stevens and Etheridge 1989; Chamberlain 2001; Hill 2005; Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010), as well as the nature of gold deposits and sources of mineralisation (Kenny 1934; Thalhammer 1992; Thalhammer et al. 1998; Brown, Vickery and Greenfield 2006; Greenfield and Reid 2006b). However, no zircon U–Pb data has been available with which to assess the validity of these interpretations.

In this article we report detrital zircon U–Pb data from the Mesozoic sediments near Tibooburra to investigate if there is a local bedrock signature in the Mesozoic sediments that could have provided a source for the placer gold mineralisation. This study is part of a memorandum of understanding between the Geological Survey of New South Wales and the Geological Survey of South Australia to promote cross-border geological understanding. These Mesozoic sedimentary rocks are also present in South Australia and the data obtained in this study contributes towards characterising the sedimentary cover in regions of eastern South Australia.

Geological background

Neoproterozoic to Ordovician

The Tibooburra Inlier is part of the Koonenberry Belt of the southwestern Thomson Orogen, western New South Wales. The Koonenberry Belt comprises a basal Neoproterozoic volcano-sedimentary succession, the Grey Range Group, which contains the c. 585 Ma Mount Arrowsmith Volcanics and shallow marine shelf sediments of mudstone and sandstone (Crawford, Stevens and Fanning 1997). These units are stratigraphically overlain by c. 510 Ma volcanics of the Mount Wright Arc and related sedimentary units of the Teltawongee Group and Ponto Group (Greenfield et al. 2011). These units were subjected to deformation and metamorphism during the Delamerian Orogeny at c. 500 Ma, which produced folds and thrusts in the greenschist facies (Brown, Vickery and Greenfield 2006; Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010).

A second cycle of marine deposition and associated volcanism occurred post-Delamerian, and manifests as Cambrian – Early Ordovician metasedimentary rocks of the Warratta Group, which includes units such as the Easter Monday Formation and Jeffreys Flat Formation (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010; Percival, Quinn and Glen 2011). Felsic volcanic units within the Easter Monday Formation of the Koonenberry Belt erupted at c. 497 Ma, while some metasedimentary units within the Warratta Group have maximum depositional ages c. 465 Ma indicating clastic sedimentation continued into the Ordovician (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010).

Deformation and metamorphism of these volcanic and sedimentary units occurred between c. 441–424 Ma and produced tight folds and thrusts associated with a penetrative, largely west-dipping cleavage (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010). The sequence was intruded by post-D1 monzodioritic sills and dykes between c. 423 and 416 Ma, and by the 420.6 ± 3.3 Ma geochemically related I-type Tibooburra Granodiorite, part of the Tibooburra Suite (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010). Primary gold mineralisation formed during this tectono-magmatic event, hosted by Warratta Group rocks and associated with syn-D1, S1-parallel, replacement quartz veins (Greenfield and Reid 2006b).

Mesozoic

Several Paleozoic bedrock inliers occur near the township of Tibooburra and surrounding region including the Tibooburra and Warratta inliers, which are exposed through the predominantly Mesozoic to Holocene sedimentary cover (Fig. 1). Other Paleozoic bedrock inliers are located to the southwest of the study area (e.g. Mount Poole, Mount Browne and the Gorge inliers; Fig. 1). The Tibooburra Inlier is a topographic high that forms the southern extent of the larger Grey Range. This high represents an area of uplift, which is a regional drainage divide (Hill 2005).

The bedrock inliers of the Tibooburra region are surrounded by Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary cover. The Mesozoic sediments of interest are part of the southeastern margin of the Eromanga Basin (Fig. 1). The sediments of the basin have been given various classifications, with different frameworks proposed for South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland (Exon and Senior 1976; Morton 1982). As the study area is located within New South Wales, the New South Wales nomenclature will be used and the South Australian equivalents will be mentioned. The basal Mesozoic unconformity can be distinguished in the landscape today as bare surface scattered with rounded quartz and unconsolidated material (Hill et al. 2008).

The oldest sedimentary package within the Eromanga Basin is the Namur Sandstone. Plant fossils from Quarry Hill suggested a Jurassic age to Kenny (1934), although more recent work suggests a Cretaceous age (Exon and Senior 1976; Hill et al. 2008). The Namur Sandstone is a lateral equivalent of the Early Cretaceous Algebuckina Sandstone that crops out across South Australia (Alley et al. 2006). The Cadna-owie Formation overlies the Namur Sandstone and has been interpreted as Early Cretaceous and more specifically Valanginian in age (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010). It contains terrestrial to marine transition sediments (Exon and Senior 1976). Overlying the Cadna-owie Formation is the uppermost group of the Eromanga Basin, the Rolling Downs Group, which comprises alternating sandstone, mudstone and calcareous units and represents sedimentation from Early to Late Cretaceous before marine regression and closure of the Eromanga Basin (Exon and Senior 1976; Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010).

Overlying the Mesozoic succession are Cenozoic sediments that make up part of the Lake Eyre Basin. They do not outcrop in the immediate vicinity of the Tibooburra Inlier, but cover expanses to the west, east and far north.

Mesozoic sediments of Tibooburra region: Quarry Hill and Tunnel Hill sites and detrital zircon sample descriptions

Three samples of sandstone were collected for detrital zircon U–Pb dating from Quarry Hill, 2.5 km southeast of Tibooburra. The samples were collected at approximate intervals 185 m, 191 m and 198 m along the exposed stratigraphic profile (samples 2116187, 2116188, 2116189; Table 1; Figs 2a, 3). The lower 10–11 m of logged sediment is interpreted as equivalent to the Namur Sandstone from the Late Jurassic – Early Cretaceous (Hill et al. 2008). It consists of a basal 1–2 m of sandy, grey, medium-grained, layered sandstone with minor ferruginous banding and conglomerate layers. The next 3 m is a more homogenous medium-grained sandstone with trough-crossbedding structures. The next 7 m, the main part of the profile, shows large tabular-crossbedding structures within medium-grained, pale sandstone. The profile fines upward in a sequence of interbedded fine-grained sandstone–claystone layers and gravelly medium-grained sandstone. Most layers have crossbedding structures (Fig. 2b). There are three upper layers of conglomerate comprising coarse, subangular quartzose pebbles within a gravelly clay cement. Upper conglomerate sandstone layers show silicification between the layers (Fig. 2c). The upper 4 m of the Quarry Hill section is interpreted as Cadna-owie Formation where the well-sorted, massively bedded sandstone is highly weathered, ferruginous and oxidised on the outside (Fig. 2d). The Quarry Hill section represents a marine transgression from a fluvial environment through to beach forefront and shallow marine.

A fourth sample of sandstone for detrital zircon dating was taken from Tunnel Hill, ~8 km west of Tibooburra along the Cameron Corner Road and then 2–3 km north of the main road (sample 2116190; Table 1; Fig. 4). The sedimentary rocks at Tunnel Hill have been mapped as Mesozoic and are similar to sediments at Quarry Hill, albeit being a coarser grained, more gravelly equivalent to the Namur Sandstone. Tunnel Hill and adjacent Nuggety Gully have hosted alluvial gold, collected by prospectors who dug the tunnel through the basal 60 cm of Tunnel Hill sediment. Kenny (1934) reported assays of 11 g/t Au over 4.6 m within this basal layer. The Tunnel Hill exposure of Namur Sandstone overlies exposed Easter Monday Formation metasediments.

Figure 2 Quarry Hill site.
Figure 2 Quarry Hill site. (a) Profile showing sample locations and lithology. (Photo 415908) (b) Detail showing cross-bedding within interpreted Namur Sandstone equivalent. (Photo 415909) (c) Silicified conglomerate layers, upper Quarry Hill profile. (Photo 415910) (d) Interpreted Cadna-owie Formation, upper portion of Quarry Hill profile. (Photo 415911)
Figure 3 Lithological log of exposed profile on southern side of Quarry Hill.
Figure 3 Lithological log of exposed profile on southern side of Quarry Hill.
Figure 4 Tunnel Hill sample location, interpreted as Namur Sandstone. (Photo 415912)
Figure 4 Tunnel Hill sample location, interpreted as Namur Sandstone. (Photo 415912)

Table 1 Summary of samples analysed in this study

SA Geodata
sample number
Location Lithology Stratigraphic unit Easting (m) Northing (m) Zone
2116187 Quarry Hill Sandstone Namur Sandstone 599414 6742354 54
2116188 Quarry Hill Sandstone Namur Sandstone 599420 6742355 54
2116189 Quarry Hill Sandstone Cadna-owie Formation 599426 6742354 54
2116190 Tunnel Hill Sandstone Namur Sandstone 589437 6744822 54

Analytical methods

Zircons were analysed by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) at Adelaide Microscopy, University of Adelaide. The samples analysed in this study were processed at a commercial mineral separation facility, Geotrack, in Victoria. Zircon concentrates were made using standard rock crushing, density and magnetic techniques. Concentrates were then hand-picked using a binocular microscope before being mounted in epoxy resin and polished to expose the grains. Zircon grains were imaged using plane-polarised light optical microscopy and cathodoluminescence (CL).

LA-ICPMS analysis utilised a 213 nm New Wave Research LA unit coupled with an Agilent 7300 quadrupole ICPMS. Time-resolved signals of 204, 206, 207, 208Pb, 232Th and 238U were acquired with a 30 μm spot size and a 5 Hz repetition rate. This data was processed using the software GLITTER (Jackson et al. 2004) with U and Th decay constants (Jaffey et al. 1971), as recommended by Steiger and Jäger (1977). The GJ standard zircon was used to calibrate Pb/U fractionation, and data quality was monitored by analysis of the Plešovice (Sláma et al. 2008) and QGNG (Black et al. 2003) reference zircons (Table 2). The LA-ICPMS technique cannot account for non-radiogenic Pb due to interference on 204Pb by 204Hg present in trace amounts in the carrier gas. Nevertheless, 204Pb was monitored during the analyses to give an indication of zircons that have very elevated non-radiogenic Pb. In most cases 204Pb remained at background values, and no correction for non-radiogenic Pb has been applied to the data. Zircon ages are reported relative to an assigned 1% uncertainty on the age of the standard for sample age error calculations.

Where the 207Pb/206Pb age was <1000 Ma, the 206Pb/238U age was used as the preferred crystallisation age. For each sample, weighted mean ages were calculated using Isoplot v3 (Ludwig 2003) to describe the major age peaks by selecting those analyses that conform to a single statistically meaningful population as indicated by a mean square of weighted deviates (MSWD) approximating 1 and a probability statistic >0.05. A weighted mean age was calculated only when the number of analyses that describe the population is greater than five. This somewhat arbitrary limit was imposed to indicate a more significant contribution to the provenance signal. A discordance filter was applied to the data such that any analysis with 207Pb/206Pb age >1000 Ma with discordance >± 10% was omitted from the calculation of statistical age populations. U–Pb data is presented in full in the Appendix.

Table 2 Summary of ages obtained from zircon reference material analysed during this study

Standard n 207Pb/206Pb (Ma) 206Pb/238U (Ma)
Plešovice      
This study 18*    340.6 1.4
Sláma et al. 2008     337.13  
QGNG      
This study 20 1851 4.3 1866 16
Black et al. 2003   1851.6 0.6   

* Two analyses produced ages not within statistical uncertainty of the main population and are not included in this weighted mean age.

Results

Zircons from the samples show a range of morphologies from elongate grains to equant grains with low length to width ratios; however, many of the grains show euhedral to subhedral crystal morphology, suggesting relatively small degrees of transport (Fig. 5). Detrital zircon samples 2116187, 2116188, 2116189 and 2116190 all show broadly similar age populations (Fig. 6; Table 3). The major age peaks and populations within all samples are dominantly Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous in age, c. 700 to 300 Ma. All Quarry Hill samples (2116187, 2116188 and 2116189) preserve major peaks at c. 575, c. 510, 480 ± 12 and 430 ± 6 Ma (Table 3). The youngest zircons, for samples collected at Quarry Hill, decrease in age as elevation within the stratigraphic profile increases (Table 3). The youngest zircon in sample 2116190 from Tunnel Hill produced a youngest age population at 434 ± 3 Ma (Table 3). All samples display small Proterozoic zircon populations, ranging from c. 2020 to 900 Ma. Samples from Quarry Hill have a minor Archean population, ranging from c. 3330 to 2555 Ma.

Figure 5 Representative zircons from sample 2116187 shown under plane-polarised light (top) and CL (bottom). Circles indicate analytical sites and corresponding analysis numbers.
Figure 5 Representative zircons from sample 2116187 shown under plane-polarised light (top) and CL (bottom). Circles indicate analytical sites and corresponding analysis numbers.
Figure 6 Detrital zircon probability density distribution for all samples analysed in this study. All data plotted for each sample.
Figure 6 Detrital zircon probability density distribution for all samples analysed in this study. All data plotted for each sample.

Table 3 Summary of the statistical age peaks obtained from each sample

SA Geodata sample number Total data Analyses not in WM age % analyses not in WM age Youngest zircon WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n WM age (Ma) n
2116187 80 38 48 369 ± 4 411 ± 5 4 428 ± 4 6 493 ± 5 6 514 ± 5 6 553 ± 13 4 583 ± 5 7 1246 ± 15 9   
2116188 50 30 60 351 ± 5    429 ± 6 4 475 ± 7 3    571 ± 9 6 601 ± 8 4 1302 ± 31 3   
2116189 40 17 43 316 ± 4      485 ± 7 3 510 ± 8 3 572 ± 9 5 633 ± 8 4 1263 ± 20 5 1714 ± 29 3
2116190 60 31 52 n/a    434 ± 3 22      586 ± 19 4    1288 ± 27 3   

Note: Each weighted mean (WM) age has a MSWD <1.5.

Discussion

Zircon provenance

Detrital zircons from each of the localities and stratigraphic units yield a predominance of Neoproterozoic to Carboniferous ages, between c. 600 and c. 316 Ma, with a subordinate population of Mesoproterozoic, c. 1300–250 Ma grains (Table 3; Fig. 6).

There are substantial Early Cambrian detrital zircon populations with peaks similar to those of the Jeffreys Flat Formation, which has populations at c. 575, 505 and 484 Ma (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010; Glen 2013). Other possible regional sources for c. 515–510 Ma zircon include units of the Mount Wright Arc such as the Teltawongee Group, Ponto Group, the c. 510 Ma Cymbric Vale Formation (EA Jagodzinski, Geological Survey of South Australia, pers. comm. 2017), and also intrusive rocks such as the c. 515 Ma Williams Peak Granite and related intrusions (Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010). The detrital zircon populations in the Mesozoic sandstones support a local derivation from these units.

In addition, there are several potential local sources for Neoproterozoic zircons, including the Grey Range Group and the c. 585 Ma Mount Arrowsmith Volcanics, which crop out southwest of Tibooburra, and were also likely reworked themselves into the Cambrian and Ordovician sedimentary succession of the Warratta Group.

Mesoproterozoic detrital zircons in the Mesozoic sandstone samples are likely derived originally from the Musgrave Province, specifically the Pitjantjatjara Supersuite (e.g. Wade et al. 2008; Jagodzinski and Dutch 2013). Zircons with ages c. 1300–1100 Ma are present in Neoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of the Adelaide Rift Complex (Ireland et al. 1998) and are likely to have been reworked along with the Neoproterozoic zircons of the Warratta Group into the Mesozoic sandstones.

The Devonian–Carboniferous age zircons could have been sourced from the Georgetown Inlier to the northeast, the New England Orogen to the east or the Lachlan Fold Belt to the east-southeast, possibly being reworked into continental-scale east–west sediment transport systems during the Mesozoic (e.g. Bodorkos et al. 2010; MacDonald et al. 2013). These younger zircons are subordinate to the main Cambrian and Ordovician zircon populations, suggesting a strong local source to the overall provenance of these Mesozoic sandstones.

Quarry Hill and Tunnel Hill sites compared

The detrital zircon age spectra suggest that Mesozoic sandstones from Quarry Hill and Tunnel Hill had different sources (Fig. 6). The Quarry Hill samples display a greater range of ages. This may suggest that paleorivers that formed this section of the Mesozoic sampled a greater variety of source material. In contrast, the Tunnel Hill sample shows a dominant peak at c. 434 Ma with only minor input of other age populations and few older (e.g. Mesoproterozoic or Archean) zircons (Fig. 6). This age peak is close to the crystallisation age of the Tibooburra Granodiorite, and the ages for the Tibooburra Suite more broadly (427.7 to 420.2 Ma; Greenfield, Gilmore and Mills 2010), and could be derived from magmatic rocks of this suite. We note that 434 ± 3 Ma lies slightly outside the uncertainty given for Tibooburra Suite intrusions, and there remains a possibility that the detrital zircon data indicate that the Tibooburra Suite may contain some slightly older intrusive phases, or they may derive from a slightly older, unrelated source.

Placer gold was historically found in Mesozoic sandstone at the Tunnel Hill locality (Kenny 1934). As the source region for the zircon at Tunnel Hill appears to be somewhat different to that in the Quarry Hill locality, this may indicate the possible source region for the alluvial gold. Sedimentary flow directions for Mesozoic units in this area indicate derivation from a source region to the west of the Tibooburra Inlier (Hill et al. 2008). Therefore, it is possible that a now buried portion of the Koonenberry Belt to the west of the Tibooburra Inlier contains a predominance of c. 434 Ma magmatic rocks. We note that there is no necessity to correlate magmatic rocks (and their zircon proxies) with the primary orogenic gold of the type found in the Warratta Inlier, since the orogenic gold does not appear to be associated with magmatism. However, coincidence between an apparently dominant zircon source and placer gold raises the question of whether the primary gold source could be associated with either the younger portions of the Warratta Group, or an unknown magmatic suite, possibly to the west of Tibooburra Inlier.

Conclusion

Mesozoic sandstones from two localities in the Tibooburra region have been analysed for their zircon age provenance. Samples from Quarry Hill have age populations of c. 575, c. 510, 480 ± 12 and 430 ± 6 Ma, with a minor Mesoproterozoic and Archean detrital component. In contrast, a sample from Tunnel Hill, which is a site of historical placer gold workings, is dominated by zircons with an age of c. 434 Ma, and less input from Ordovician or older source regions. The majority of these zircon ages can be sourced from local volcano-sedimentary units of the Koonenberry Belt, or in the case of the few Carboniferous zircons present in each sample, sourced from more distal regions such as the New England Orogen. It is possible that the c. 434 Ma age peak is an indicator of the age of the rocks that host the primary source region for the gold present at Tunnel Hill, deposited within the gravelly Mesozoic sediments. The location of the primary gold remains unclear; it may be associated with the upper units of the Warratta Formation, such as the Easter Monday Formation, or possibly with c. 427–420 Ma Tibooburra Suite intrusions, or an as yet unknown c. 434 Ma magmatic suite in the region.

Acknowledgements

This study was undertaken while Ava Stephens was employed as a vacation student with the Geological Survey of South Australia (GSSA). Thanks to Alex Liu for help with CL imaging. Ben Wade is acknowledged for assistance with U–Pb dating at Adelaide Microscopy. Mark Pawley and Liz Jagodzinski (GSSA) provided helpful reviews of the article and we appreciate their time and effort.

Appendix: LA-ICPMS U–Pb zircon geochronology data

Summary of LA-ICPMS U–Pb zircon geochronology data obtained in this study. (XLS; 80 KB)

References

Alley NF, White MR, Price PL and Wood GR 2006. Dating and correlating Eromanga Basin sediments. In TB Cotton, MF Scardigno and JE Hibburt eds, The petroleum geology of South Australia, Volume 2: Eromanga Basin, Petroleum Geology of South Australia Series 002. 2nd edn. Department of Primary Industries and Resources South Australia, Adelaide, p. 21.

Black LP, Kamo SL, Williams IS, Mundil R, Davis DW, Korsch RJ and Foudoulis C 2003. The application of SHRIMP to Phanerozoic geochronology; a critical appraisal of four zircon standards. Chemical Geology 200:171–188.

Bodorkos S, Blevin PL, Simpson CJ, Gilmore PJ, Glen RA, Greenfield JE, Hegarty R and Quinn CD 2010. New SHRIMP U-Pb zircon ages from the Lachlan, Thomson and Delamerian orogens, Geoscience Australia Record 2013/29, Geological Survey of New South Wales Report GS2013/0427. Geoscience Australia, Canberra.

Brown RE, Vickery NM and Greenfield JE 2006. Geology and mineralisation of the Cambrian to Devonian inliers in the Tibooburra area. Broken Hill Exploration Initiative: Abstracts for the September 2006 Conference, Record 2006/21. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, pp. 16–21.

Chamberlain T 2001. Regolith geology and landscape evolution of the Tibooburra Inlier, north-west New South Wales. BSc Hons thesis, University of Canberra.

Crawford AJ, Stevens BPJ and Fanning M 1997. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of some Neoproterozoic and Early Cambrian volcanics in western New South Wales. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 44:831–852.

Exon NF and Senior BR 1976. The Cretaceous of the Eromanga and Surat basins. BMR Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 1:33–50.

Forbes C, Giles D, Freeman H, Sawyer M and Normington V 2015. Glacial dispersion of hydrothermal monazite in the Prominent Hill deposit: an exploration tool. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 156:10–33.

Glen RA 2013. Refining accretionary orogen models for the Tasmanides of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 60:315–370.

Greenfield JE, Gilmore PJ and Mills KJ comps 2010. Explanatory notes for the Koonenberry Belt geological maps, Bulletin 35. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Sydney.

Greenfield JE, Musgrave RJ, Bruce MC, Gilmore PJ and Mills KJ 2011. The Mount Wright Arc: a Cambrian subduction system developed on the continental margin of east Gondwana, Koonenberry Belt, eastern Australia. Gondwana Research 19:650–669.

Greenfield JE and Reid WJ 2006a. Orogenic gold in the Tibooburra area north of Broken Hill - an extension of the Victorian Goldfields? Broken Hill Exploration Initiative: Abstracts for the September 2006 Conference, Record 2006/21. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, pp. 60–69.

Greenfield J and Reid W 2006b. Orogenic gold in the Tibooburra area of northwestern NSW- a ~440 Ma ore system with comparison to the Victorian Goldfields. ASEG Extended Abstracts 2006: 18th Geophysical Conference. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 1–8.

Hill SM 2005. Regolith and landscape evolution of far western New South Wales. In RR Anand and P de Broekert eds, Regolith landscape evolution across Australia. Cooperative Research Centre for Landscape Environments and Mineral Exploration (CRC LEME), Perth, pp. 130–145.

Hill S, Greenfield J, Gilmore P and Reid W 2008. Guide for mineral exploration through and within the regolith in the southwestern Thomson Orogen, New South Wales. Cooperative Research Centre for Landscape Environments and Mineral Exploration (CRC LEME), CSIRO Exploration and Mining, Bentley, WA.

Ireland TR, Flottmann T, Fanning CM, Gibson GM and Preiss WV 1998. Development of the early Paleozoic Pacific margin of Gondwana from detrital-zircon ages across the Delamerian orogeny. Geology 26:243–246.

Jackson SE, Pearson NJ, Griffin WL and Belousova EA 2004. The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in-situ U-Pb zircon geochronology. Chemical Geology 211:47–69.

Jaffey AH, Flynn KF, Glendenin LE, Bentley WC and Essling AM 1971. Precision measurement of half-lives and specific activities of 235U and 238U. Physical Reviews C 4:1,889–1,906.

Jagodzinski EA and Dutch R 2013. SHRIMP U-Pb geochronology of the Tieyon (5645) 1:100 000 mapsheet, Report Book 2013/00006. Department for Manufacturing, Innovation, Trade, Resources and Energy, South Australia, Adelaide.

Kenny EJ 1934. West Darling district: a geological reconnaissance with special reference to the resources of subsurface water, Mineral Resources 36. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Sydney.

Ludwig KR 2003. User’s manual for Isoplot 3.00: a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel, Special Publication 4. Berkeley Geochronological Center, Berkeley CA.

MacDonald JD, Holford SP, Green PF, Duddy IR, King RC and Backé G 2013. Detrital zircon data reveal the origin of Australia’s largest delta system. Journal of the Geological Society 170:3–6.

Morton JGG 1982. The Mesozoic-Cainozoic stratigraphy and faunas of the Tibooburra-Milparinka area. MSc thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.

Percival IG, Quinn CD and Glen RA 2011. A review of Cambrian and Ordovician stratigraphy in New South Wales. Quarterly Notes 137:1–39. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Sydney.

Sláma J, Košler J, Condon DJ, Crowley JL, Axel G, Hanchar JM, Horstwood MSA, Morris GA, Nasdala L, Norberg N, Schaltegger U, Schoene B, Tubrett MN and Whitehouse MJ 2008. Plešovice zircon - a new natural reference material for U–Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis. Chemical Geology 249:1–35.

Steiger RH and Jäger E 1977. Subcommission of Geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36:359–362.

Stevens BPJ and Etheridge LT 1989. Traverse geology of the Tibooburra Inliers, Report GS1989/390. Geological Survey of New South Wales, Sydney.

Thalhammer OAR 1992. Deformation history and the formation of auriferous quartz veins in the Warratta and Mount Poole inliers, northwestern New South Wales, Australia. Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Proceedings 297(2):45–63.

Thalhammer OAR, Stevens BPJ, Gibson JH and Grum W 1998. Tibooburra Granodiorite, western New South Wales: emplacement history and geochemistry. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 45:775–787.

Wade BP, Kelsey DE, Hand M and Barovich KM 2008. The Musgrave Province: stitching north, west and south Australia. Precambrian Research 166:370–386.

Wiedenbeck M, Alle P, Corfu F, Griffin WL, Meier M, Oberli F, Von Quart A, Roddick JC and Speigel W 1995. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Th trace element and REE analyses. Geostandards Newsletter 19:1–23.

Back to top

For more information, contact:

Anthony Reid
Anthony.Reid@sa.gov.au
+61 8 8463 3039